Add preferred source
Bitcoin climbed roughly 11% to settle above the $80,000 level even after the U.S. Senate failed to advance the CLARITY Act, a digital asset market structure bill. Bitwise CIO Matt Hougan argued that avoiding certain regulatory provisions embedded in the bill — including a ban on stablecoin yield payments — actually proved positive for the market. In the immediate aftermath, the SEC announced a five-year innovation exemption and issued token buyback guidance, signaling a separate regulatory track. During the same period, the market absorbed headwinds from a Federal Reserve rate hike and a sharp surge in Treasury yields, yet U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs attracted approximately $3 billion in net inflows over seven consecutive trading days, underpinning the price rebound. With institutional capital playing an increasingly prominent role, analysts suggest this correction was shallower and shorter than in previous cycles.
Key Elements
Even after the U.S. Senate failed to advance the CLARITY Act — a digital asset market structure bill — Bitcoin and the broader cryptocurrency market continued a double-digit rebound, prompting analysis that avoiding certain regulatory provisions in the legislation actually proved beneficial for the market.
Bitwise Chief Investment Officer Matt Hougan said in a recent report that while the crypto industry missed out on long-term regulatory certainty at the federal level due to the bill’s collapse, it also sidestepped several provisions that could have constrained industry growth.
The U.S. Senate recorded 49 votes in favor and 50 against in a cloture vote on September 15 to advance the CLARITY Act. The bill needed 60 votes to proceed to full debate and a final vote, but fell short of that threshold.
On the day of the vote, Bitcoin dropped roughly 4%, from about $77,200 to $75,000. The prevailing view was that the bill’s failure would weigh on crypto prices. But the subsequent trajectory unfolded in the opposite direction. Since September 15, Bitcoin has risen approximately 11% and Ethereum about 12%, with some mid- and small-cap digital assets posting even larger gains. Total crypto market capitalization increased roughly 11% over the same period, from about $2.65 trillion to $2.95 trillion.
Avoiding Regulatory Burden Proved a Tailwind
Hougan pointed to stablecoin yield restrictions as a prime example. The final version of the bill included language prohibiting platforms from paying interest or returns on customer stablecoin balances. With the bill stalled, exchanges such as Coinbase can continue offering related reward services under the existing GENIUS Act framework, he explained.
The bill’s failure could also work in favor of established large exchanges, Hougan noted. The CLARITY Act would have introduced a nationwide licensing framework that made it easier for new entrants to access the market, while potentially imposing constraints on businesses offering both exchange and brokerage services.
The fact that the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) moved forward with separate regulatory actions after the bill stalled is also noteworthy. Days after the vote, the SEC announced a five-year “innovation exemption” allowing limited trading of tokenized U.S. stocks on on-chain platforms. The exemption, effective through September 17, 2031, permits trading of tokenized versions of stocks listed on major U.S. exchanges through blockchain-based automated market maker liquidity pools.
The SEC also issued additional guidance on token buybacks. Through recently updated frequently asked questions (FAQs), the agency clarified that a properly functioning digital asset network’s mere announcement of a token buyback plan does not, by itself, render the token sale an investment contract.
However, Hougan cautioned that the current structure — relying on administrative actions by regulators rather than congressional legislation — carries the risk that policy direction could shift under a future administration. He assessed the situation by saying crypto “got better rules faster at the expense of long-term certainty.”
Rebound Continued Despite Rate Hike
The crypto market absorbed not only the CLARITY Act’s collapse but also another headwind: a Federal Reserve rate hike. The Fed raised its benchmark rate by 25 basis points at the September 16 Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) meeting, bringing it to a range of 3.75%–4.0%. It was the first hike since 2023. The dot plot suggested the possibility of additional increases within the year, and markets priced in a greater than 60% probability of an October hike.
Long-term Treasury yields also surged. As of September 28, the 10-year U.S. Treasury yield stood at approximately 5.23%, its highest level since 2007, while the 30-year yield reached about 5.55%, the highest since 2004. High interest rate environments typically work against non-yielding assets, yet Bitcoin weathered the pressure.
Flows into U.S. spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs) offer a clue. After roughly $746 million in net outflows over September 15–16, flows flipped to net inflows for seven consecutive trading days starting September 17, accumulating approximately $3 billion. Notably, the single-week net inflow from September 21–25 totaled about $2.39 billion — the largest since October 2025.
According to Bloomberg estimates, the average purchase price for ETF holders is approximately $81,700. With Bitcoin recovering to this level, ETF holders entered overall unrealized profit territory for the first time since January 2026. On the institutional side, Strategy resumed buying in mid-September after a three-week pause, and perpetual futures funding rates returned to near zero, suggesting significant deleveraging had occurred.
Structural Shifts Raised the Floor
A defining feature of this downcycle was that it was shallower and shorter than in the past. Bitcoin fell approximately 54% from its October 2025 peak of about $126,000 to its late-June 2026 low of roughly $58,500. Compared with the 84% drawdown in the 2018–19 cycle and the 77% decline in 2022–23, the recovery pace stands out.
Even more notable is that during this downturn, Bitcoin never closed below its “realized price” — the average acquisition cost of all coins — on a daily basis. The network-wide unrealized loss conditions that always appeared in past deep bear markets did not materialize this time.
Grayscale Head of Research Zach Pandl and on-chain analyst James Check have publicly suggested the bottom may have already formed around $58,000 in June. Bitwise likewise characterized this correction as a “shallower, shorter” bear market.
The growing presence of spot ETFs and institutional investors is cited as a key driver of this shift. Institutional capital with higher average cost bases and longer holding periods stepped in to buy during the downturn, compressing the fear phase.
On the price front, Bitcoin spiked to about $87,400 on September 21 — its highest since late January — before retracing roughly two-thirds of the gains to settle near $83,000. According to Glassnode analysis, if Bitcoin can hold $84,000 on a sustained basis, the data suggests a path toward $96,700 is open. Conversely, if this support level breaks, $77,000 re-emerges as the key baseline.
Key price levels market participants are watching are as follows:
| Price Level | Significance |
|---|---|
| approximately $96,700 | Point where holder average returns recover to long-term normal levels |
| approximately $84,000–$85,000 | Densest accumulation zone for long-term holders |
| approximately $81,700 | Estimated average purchase price for U.S. spot ETF holders |
| approximately $76,000–$77,000 | Average cost basis of recent active buyers (real market average price) |
| approximately $69,000 | Short-term buyer cost basis |
Variables that will determine the market’s future direction include the sustainability of ETF inflows, the trajectory of the 10-year Treasury yield, and whether the SEC’s innovation exemption leads to formal rulemaking and coordination with congressional legislation. In the near term, a key question is whether the decline in daily ETF net inflows — from approximately $999 million on September 21 to around $134 million thereafter — signals cooling momentum in chase buying.
The CLARITY Act has effectively lost momentum in this session, but it is not entirely dead. Supporters could renegotiate terms or secure new co-sponsors to revive the bill in the next session. For the time being, U.S. crypto regulation is expected to remain driven by administrative actions from the SEC and CFTC rather than congressional legislation.
Once added, BigGo Finance appears first in Google Search Top Stories, so you get the broadest, most up-to-the-minute, and most comprehensive global financial news first.
